|
|
|
* We will NEVER rent, trade or release your information to any third party for any reason - ever.
|
|
Court Case Transcript - US Supreme Court Takes Lead
Court case transcript access via the Internet gained its most powerful
advocate in the US Supreme Court. Beginning October 2006, the high court will
give the public access to transcripts of proceedings within the same day. Before
this, transcript release occurred with a couple of weeks' delay.
The American public – and anyone in the world with Internet access – will be
able to view specific oral debates through court transcripts posted on the
Supreme Court website effective October 2006.
The move was seen by many as a step in the direction of TV or radio coverage of
the proceedings that were once shrouded in a certain shroud of inaccessibility.
This open policy is characteristic of many judicial measures of late, such as
putting everything from dockets to rulings, to even personal data, online.
Before this, oral debates were posted only on media or university websites, some
even with audio. American law aficionados, however, feel that merely putting
transcripts of such an influential part of US policy and history as the Supreme
Court is a poor alternative to actual audio (or even video) coverage.
The previous Supreme Court once gave into public clamor for real time coverage
when it broadcast audio of the 2000 Florida presidential race debates. Incumbent
Justices who have given their comments generally approve of this more open
policy.
Court Case Transcript Access is Here to Stay
Court case transcript access for high court proceedings have gained so many
advocates that we are likely to see this open policy replicated in the lower
courts.
And the availability of WHOLE transcripts has many advocates. Perhaps the most
quotable Justice, Antonin Scalia, for example, cautioned against sporadic
coverage, especially when it comes to featuring takeouts in network news
programs.
He warns that for every individual who watches the entire proceedings on C-SPAN
to be able to get a complete picture of the high court, there will be thousands
who will catch a few seconds of it on the news, which Scalia guarantees will be
misleading.
Scalia concludes that partial broadcasts will, therefore, only misinform people
instead of making them more knowledgeable about how the Supreme Court works.
Open policy advocates have, for many years, asked the Supreme Court to speed up
court case transcript release, which have been documented via audiotapes of
actual proceedings as far back as ca. 1950.
Advocates see no reason not to make proceedings remotely accessible since, they
reason, the White House routinely makes transcripts of the President's
statements, as well as those of other officials, available to the media almost
as soon as they are made.
Still, there IS something to be said about completeness right? A court
transcript posted today does not encompass the whole court proceedings. And if
you are looking for the ‘whole picture’, then it’s better to get all related
court records instead of trying to ‘piece them together’ from what you see
online.
---
For easy, uncomplicated searches of court records, visit
RecordsSiteReviews for a list of our top picks
of court records providers.
|
